King’s Quarter Regeneration

It would appear that the days are numbered for the much-reviled Golden Egg building in King’s Square. According to a report in the Citizen on Wednesday a planning application has been submitted to demolish it.

This should come as no surprise as a month ago The Citizen reported that the long-awaited multi-million pound face-lift of the King’s Quarter was finally to get underway as Gloucester City Council were in negotiations with developer Stanhope PLC.

King’s Quarter includes not only King’s Square, but also the Bus Station, both of which represent a major eyesore in the middle of the city. According to the report, “The King’s Quarter scheme is likely to get new shops, bars, restaurants, residential and office facilities, as well as a new bus station.” Good news indeed.

In fact, so welcome is the news that when you read through the comments on these stories there is a much more positive vibe than usual. Sure there are the usual knee-jerk whingers and cynics, but there are far more people looking forward with some optimism to the scheme.

I am undoubtedly in favour of the scheme. The city centre desperately needs bringing back to life and the only way to do this is to provide an attractive proposition to some big-name stores to pull in shoppers who want to spend money in the city. New bars and restaurants are also good, although I would hope that the existing excellent pubs would also see trade pick up as the city becomes more attractive.

The cynics shouldn’t entirely be ignored, however. I must admit to a touch of “I’ll believe it when I see it” cynicism myself: we’ve been here before, but seen nothing beyond plans and artists impressions.

There is also plenty of scope to get it catastrophically wrong. The design has to be appropriate – not too bland, but not some crazy architects wet dream either: something practical, functional and yet attractive. Not an easy thing to pull off. Whatever the design, it’s not going to please everyone. At some point somebody is going to have to be brave enough to make a decision so that the whole thing doesn’t run into inertia. I don’t envy them the job.

One concern that you hear a lot is about the residential element. The worry here seems to be that we could end up turning the city into a housing estate – a criticism frequently levelled at the docks. I don’t think that this needs to be a concern. When people don their rose-tinted spectacles and look back on the city of yester-year, one thing they seem to identify is that the city was much more vibrant when more people lived in it. The post-war slum clearances moved people on mass to new estates in the outskirts leaving the centre deserted and soulless.

However, experience from the docks shows that building houses in the city doesn’t necessarily make it vibrant. Where are all of those residents in the evenings? Not in the local pubs and restaurants it would seem.   

Finally, the scheme has to work as a whole for the city. A revitalised King’s Quarter linked to the Quays via the Greyfriars development (planning also in progress) and the Southgate Linkges scheme (underway) sounds brilliant, but it is going to need some joined up thinking.

So, in summary then, a great step forward for the city – as long as it actually happens this time and as long as it is done properly. Meanwhile, we Gloucester residents should keep a keen eye on proceedings, but remain optimistic and constructive and actually give the planners a chance to put their case before deciding it’s all going to be rubbish.

I’ll leave you with a thought courtesy of my brother, Russell. Around fifty years after the end of the Victorian period everyone decided that Victorian architecture was outdated and needed bringing into the modern era. Vast development schemes were enacted to put this vision into place. Now, another fifty years later, we are doing the same again. In another fifty years will we be looking back on King’s Square and saying “how could they demolish such a superb piece of period architecture and design”?

King's Square

Advertisements

About Darrel Kirby

I am what I am.
This entry was posted in Gloucester and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to King’s Quarter Regeneration

  1. janh1 says:

    No we won’t Darrel, we definitely, definitely won’t!! 🙂

    King’s Square should have been nuked at least 10 years ago. I don’t know the reason why things take so long to change in Gloucester but it might be the same reason why the City is dying on its feet.

    Talking about the Docks, I love the warehouse renovations but I hate those stupid blue apartments. I mean, why blue? What does that fit with? And why does the new college stick out like a pale thumb? Honestly, it makes you wonder what the hell the planners are up to these days. No-one seems to give a toss about the final effect on the cityscape. Rant over.

    • Darrel Kirby says:

      I agree with your assessment of most of the recent developments. At least in the post-war re-developments I suspect most people agreed with the bright new modern view of the future. King’s Square won Civic Trust awards!

      These days we seem to hate the new designs from the start, so I am less certain that in 50 years we may not look back nostalgically on the architectural revolution of the 60s and bemoan it’s callous destruction. After all, we destroyed King’s Square without even having any idea what to replace it with.

      Having said that, though, I live in hope that the designers will come up with something fabulous that we will still treasure 50 years from now…

  2. Russ says:

    Actually, I already miss King’s Square of the 1970s. No more generations of kids shopping with their parents soaked to the knee with scraped shins from the stepping stones. Seriously though, I believe it to looked better than the large featureless slab of concrete we have now. And as for the Golden Egg, even well into the 80s no-one complained about the building when it was well kept as Golden Egg and later as Wimpy, it is only since with the likes of Gift’s [sic] Direct that move in for a couple of weeks over Christmas without giving a hoot for its upkeep or appearance.
    Otherwise, really quite excited that I get a mention in the blog.

  3. trollhunterx says:

    Four, but I’m here under a misapprehension. I saw ‘King’s Quarter’ and read ‘Westgate Quarter’ (or is it the other way round?). I was going to relate the fact that I walked down to the Westgate area a month back to take a few pics of the regeneration work going on, and couldn’t find any. Having now duly done so, I take my leave…

  4. Denise Probert says:

    We’ve lived in Gloucester for ten years in May. I can never understand who owns what parts of the city or who is responsible for what. Nor do I understand why there are so many changes of plan and so many hiccups always resulting in nothing much at all including what isn’t happening in King’s Square. It took an age for a few signs to go up showing the way to Gloucester Quays. If there are no signs surrounding the city who knows it is there?

    • Darrel Kirby says:

      True King’s Square has been talked about many times before, but it’s looking good now. These things always seem to grind to a halt during public consultation – the local populace seem far too cynical.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s